Nomination Submission and Evaluation
Nominations should be submitted to the SIVB Awards Committee,
who will forward the applications to their respective sections
for review. Nominations cannot be made by the nominee's major
professor/sponsor. The section-level (currently Plant Biotechnology
and In Vitro Animal Cell Sciences) awards committee will rank
the candidates and forward their recommendations to the SIVB
Awards Committee.
Excellence Categories (list in order of significance on the
Nomination Form):
Successful candidates will present evidence of excellence in
the first category and at least three of the remaining five
categories below:
A. Scientific contribution to the SIVB.
B. Evidence of quality teaching at the undergraduate
and/or graduate levels.
C. Effectiveness in outreach activities.
D. Significance and originality of basic and/or applied
research.
E. Achievement in private sector application of in vitro
sciences.
F. Contribution to the public or to professional organizations
or institutions.
Operating Definition for Excellence Categories:
A. Scientific contribution to the SIVB: Note participation
by publishing article(s) in In Vitro-Animal or -Plant, and/or
participating in annual meeting(s) by chairing session(s), being
an invited speaker, and/or having abstract(s) approved for presentation.
B. Teaching excellence: Note percentage of time or weight
committed to teaching students within a classroom or instructional
laboratory setting, advising of undergraduate and graduate students,
evaluating teaching effectiveness, and performing other related
teaching activities. Document the number of courses taught,
students taught and advised, summary of student and peer evaluations,
awards or recognitions received, and teaching grants (proposals
written and funding received).
C. Outreach excellence: Note percentage of time or weight
committed to planning, performance and evaluation of outreach
activities. Document the listing and evaluation of outreach
activities, awards or recognitions received, and outreach grants
(proposals written and funding received).
D. Research excellence: Note percentage of time or weight
committed to planning, performing and evaluating basic and/or
applied research activities. List and evaluate the research
activities, awards or recognitions received, and research grants
(proposals written and funding received).
E. Private sector excellence: Note percentage of time
or weight committed to contributions to the private sector.
For academicians, this category might include collaborative
research and product development and intellectual property protection
activities with industrial partners. For industrial scientists,
this category might include activities associated with product
and process development and intellectual property protection
beyond discovery research components listed in category C. Document
and evaluate achievements, awards or recognitions received,
and patents granted.
F. Public/Professional excellence: Note percentage of
time or weight committed to contributions to public or professional
organizations. List and evaluate memberships, leadership positions
and accomplishments in professional societies, university or
civic groups, governmental agencies, etc., including any awards
or recognitions received in this category.